In his March blog, ASQ CEO Paul Borawski asks if anyone had spotted a place where a quality tool would really come in handy. I am happy to announce that I am in the midst of a planned weight loss program. I lost 52 lbs during July-November to achieve my target weight, and have been in transition mode back to "normal" foods since December while maintaining my new weight.
During my weekly consulting sessions the weight loss coach would take my blood pressure, measure my weight and every few weeks conduct an "in-body" scan of muscle vs body fat. I continue to be amazed by the large variation between blood pressure monitors and the apparent lack of standardization between the different scales. Fortunately, these devices are not life critical in a weight loss program, but how often do you question whether the lab equipment at your clinic, in the dentist's office, or in the hospital are calibrated, or whether the test methods are validated and in a state of statistical control?
In a story making local and state headlines, the St Paul Police Crime Lab suspended its drug testing in July 2012 after public defenders challenged the reliability of the lab's work in court. The lab provides drug testing for Dakota, Ramsey and Washington counties. The problems at the crime lab have thrown thousands of past and pending cases
into question. In a report from MPR News, "A senior lab employee also testified that the lab lacks written
procedures for testing evidence for drugs and provides only informal
training to new employees. The lab, which processes up to 50 cases per
day, does not regularly review its work to check for errors, the
employees said, and, like many other smaller crime labs in Minnesota, is
not accredited by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors."
Minnesota law does not require accreditation for crime labs, although
evidence from these labs play an increasingly larger role in
convicting people of drug possession, murder, and other crimes. Perhaps this case will cause the state government to reconsider the value of quality audits, equipment calibration, standard procedures, measurement quality assurance and operator training and certification.
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Celebrate Failure As Learning, Leading to Growth
According to an ASQ survey conducted by Kelton Global, while 95 percent of teens agree that
risk-taking is required for innovation in science, technology,
engineering and mathematics - or STEM - careers, 46 percent say they
are afraid to fail or uncomfortable taking risks to solve problems. Failing and trying again is key to problem-solving in STEM careers, including the field of quality. Fewer teens are pursuing STEM
fields today because of the fear of bad grades. ASQ CEO, Paul Borawski, suggests that "We need to teach today’s students how to take
risks and fail so they feel comfortable when faced with challenging
work."
Changing this fear of failure - and the impact of bad grades - requires a culture change where failure is recognized and celebrated as learning; where taking a chance by enrolling in a difficult course that stretches one's ability and receiving a lower passing grade - is rewarded with some kind of bonus points. Not all risks are equal; not all "A's" or "D's" are the same. Formal learning and grading systems should consider the degree of difficulty when calculating the student's grade. Failure in the business world is ultimately evaluated from the perspective of dollars and sense. It has been my experience in business that "bad" financial results are much more palatable when the quality of the decison-making process was first-rate. Project Management Institute (PMI) tells us that minimizing the negative impact of risk can be accomplished by maximizing the expected monetary value of a decision. Expected Monetary Value (EMV) allows you to quantitatively prioritize risk: prioritize the risks with the highest probability of occurrence versus the risks with the greatest monetary impact. EMV Decision Trees help identify the set of options available to minimize risk and maximize opportunity. For example, a "make or buy" decision can be evaluated with knowledge of the probability of each risk along with the monetary value of each risk.
I have used EMV on occasion in my career when considering the cost vs benefit of alternatives impacting quality and reliability. An interesting exercise for the potential STEM student and mentor might be to construct an EMV decision tree to evaluate curriculum options (effort vs. expected grade) using the anticipated earnings of a STEM versus non-STEM career.
In today's fast changing world we must all become comfortable with the uncomfortable. However, that does not mean we should haphazardly make important decisions in the name of speed. According to a study reported in HBR, "...operational speed is quite different from strategic speed. Firms that 'slowed down to speed up' improved their top and bottom lines, averaging 40% higher sales and 52% higher operating profits over a three-year period... higher-performing companies with strategic speed made alignment a priority. They became more open to ideas and discussion. They encouraged innovative thinking. And they allowed time to reflect and learn."
Allowing mistakes and accepting failure as learning helps to encourage experimentation, potentially leading to breakthrough or even disruptive innovation resulting in personal growth and organizational success.
Changing this fear of failure - and the impact of bad grades - requires a culture change where failure is recognized and celebrated as learning; where taking a chance by enrolling in a difficult course that stretches one's ability and receiving a lower passing grade - is rewarded with some kind of bonus points. Not all risks are equal; not all "A's" or "D's" are the same. Formal learning and grading systems should consider the degree of difficulty when calculating the student's grade. Failure in the business world is ultimately evaluated from the perspective of dollars and sense. It has been my experience in business that "bad" financial results are much more palatable when the quality of the decison-making process was first-rate. Project Management Institute (PMI) tells us that minimizing the negative impact of risk can be accomplished by maximizing the expected monetary value of a decision. Expected Monetary Value (EMV) allows you to quantitatively prioritize risk: prioritize the risks with the highest probability of occurrence versus the risks with the greatest monetary impact. EMV Decision Trees help identify the set of options available to minimize risk and maximize opportunity. For example, a "make or buy" decision can be evaluated with knowledge of the probability of each risk along with the monetary value of each risk.
I have used EMV on occasion in my career when considering the cost vs benefit of alternatives impacting quality and reliability. An interesting exercise for the potential STEM student and mentor might be to construct an EMV decision tree to evaluate curriculum options (effort vs. expected grade) using the anticipated earnings of a STEM versus non-STEM career.
In today's fast changing world we must all become comfortable with the uncomfortable. However, that does not mean we should haphazardly make important decisions in the name of speed. According to a study reported in HBR, "...operational speed is quite different from strategic speed. Firms that 'slowed down to speed up' improved their top and bottom lines, averaging 40% higher sales and 52% higher operating profits over a three-year period... higher-performing companies with strategic speed made alignment a priority. They became more open to ideas and discussion. They encouraged innovative thinking. And they allowed time to reflect and learn."
Allowing mistakes and accepting failure as learning helps to encourage experimentation, potentially leading to breakthrough or even disruptive innovation resulting in personal growth and organizational success.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
21st Century Quality
13 years into what Dr. Juran said would be the "Century of Quality", ASQ CEO Paul Borawski asks in his January 2013 blog post, "What do you use as the best, most inclusive, and illuminating definition of quality?" The 2011 Future of Quality Study defines Quality as a force of change, and introduces the concept of
"21st Century Quality" - Quality is ultimately what the customer says it is, and what the customer is willing to pay for. Quality today is more than product quality. Perfect product is a given. Exceptional service and transactional quality are often powerful differentiators.
People often ask, “How is Quality different than Lean Six Sigma?” It is my opinion that while Lean, Six Sigma, PDCA, etc. are all important problem solving and continuous methods in the Quality practitioner toolkit, Quality is much more than continuous improvement. A key role of the Quality function is to manage the organizational white spaces that exist between departments in cross-functional work systems and processes. Quality recognizes the importance of effective hand-offs between internal supplier and customers to meet and exceed end user requirements. The Baldrige Criteria offers an excellent framework that describes this holistic definition of Quality. I want you to visualize the hamburger. The bottom bun represents the organization's values and principles. The top bun symbolizes its mission, vision, strategies and plans. Lean, Six Sigma, CAPA, PDCA, PPU are the condiments. The meat, cheese and vegetables are the key business processes of leadership, strategic planning, customer focus, human capital, process management, and business results. Quality assures the alignment of these systems and processes to deliver a satisfying burger experience.
Winning in today’s highly competitive, global market requires flawless execution at the speed of the customer. Delivering Total Customer Experience requires stable and capable processes, with consistent flow, and an engaged, motivated and empowered workforce. To quote Ernst & Young, "There is little chance that your customers will be excited about your products or services unless your workers are."
- Quality improvement is the process of managing variation around customers’ expectations.
- Quality processes deliver brand promise, protect the enterprise, improve operational excellence, enable customer-perceived value, increase customer satisfaction.
- Quality, then, in its simplest definition is "Total Customer Experience."
People often ask, “How is Quality different than Lean Six Sigma?” It is my opinion that while Lean, Six Sigma, PDCA, etc. are all important problem solving and continuous methods in the Quality practitioner toolkit, Quality is much more than continuous improvement. A key role of the Quality function is to manage the organizational white spaces that exist between departments in cross-functional work systems and processes. Quality recognizes the importance of effective hand-offs between internal supplier and customers to meet and exceed end user requirements. The Baldrige Criteria offers an excellent framework that describes this holistic definition of Quality. I want you to visualize the hamburger. The bottom bun represents the organization's values and principles. The top bun symbolizes its mission, vision, strategies and plans. Lean, Six Sigma, CAPA, PDCA, PPU are the condiments. The meat, cheese and vegetables are the key business processes of leadership, strategic planning, customer focus, human capital, process management, and business results. Quality assures the alignment of these systems and processes to deliver a satisfying burger experience.
Winning in today’s highly competitive, global market requires flawless execution at the speed of the customer. Delivering Total Customer Experience requires stable and capable processes, with consistent flow, and an engaged, motivated and empowered workforce. To quote Ernst & Young, "There is little chance that your customers will be excited about your products or services unless your workers are."
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Stating Your Case for a Raise
ASQ Quality Progress recently published its annual salary survey, which again confirms the value of professional certification. As we close out another year many U.S. companies are conducting annual workforce performance reviews attempting to quantify the relative value and merits of employee contributions. Given today's challenging economic environment confronting every employer what is your case for requesting a raise? Regardless whether you are an individual contributor or a supervisor/manager, how have you helped "move the needle" in terms of delivering organizational results?
ASQ CEO Paul Borawski summarizes that the Quality practitioner's primary impact to business results are typically achieved in the areas of "... Customers more satisfied, revenue enhanced, money saved, waste reduced, lives saved, or risks managed". Personally speaking, quantifying my impact to business results is made more difficult because as the leader of a corporate staff function I do not have line operation responsibility. Any impact I have to drive business results is the measure of my ability to motivate, educate, engage and influence others. Indeed my role is primarily that of change agent, teacher/coach/consultant, project leader, mentor, cheerleader, customer advocate, and champion for performance excellence. "3M Quality" is a recognized value differentiator delivering customer-perceived best in class performance. Every 3M employee at every level of the organization is responsible for assuring Total Customer Experience.
I approach my role as a servant leader focused on helping my direct reports and business clients to succeed. The case for a raise in 2013 will be made by my clients. Here we use an appraisal process incorporating 360 degree feedback; I am perfectly comfortable letting my employees and clients judge whether I am adding business value while promoting 3M values:
ASQ CEO Paul Borawski summarizes that the Quality practitioner's primary impact to business results are typically achieved in the areas of "... Customers more satisfied, revenue enhanced, money saved, waste reduced, lives saved, or risks managed". Personally speaking, quantifying my impact to business results is made more difficult because as the leader of a corporate staff function I do not have line operation responsibility. Any impact I have to drive business results is the measure of my ability to motivate, educate, engage and influence others. Indeed my role is primarily that of change agent, teacher/coach/consultant, project leader, mentor, cheerleader, customer advocate, and champion for performance excellence. "3M Quality" is a recognized value differentiator delivering customer-perceived best in class performance. Every 3M employee at every level of the organization is responsible for assuring Total Customer Experience.
I approach my role as a servant leader focused on helping my direct reports and business clients to succeed. The case for a raise in 2013 will be made by my clients. Here we use an appraisal process incorporating 360 degree feedback; I am perfectly comfortable letting my employees and clients judge whether I am adding business value while promoting 3M values:
- Act with uncompromising honesty and integrity in everything we do.
- Satisfy our customers with innovative technology and superior quality, value and service.
- Provide our investors an attractive return through sustainable, global growth.
- Respect our social and physical environment around the world.
- Earn the admiration of all those associated with 3M worldwide.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Accelerating the Adoption of Quality
As we celebrate World Quality Month this November, ASQ CEO Paul Borawski asks the Quality community what can we do to accelerate the rate of adoption of quality? A big part of the solution, I believe, is to promote the broader role of "quality" in everyday life. This month the leaders of the MN Section of ASQ organized several community service projects partnering with the Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity to "build a House of Quality". We strategically chose two Saturdays in November with Habitat for Humanity to both recognize World Quality Month and to demonstrate the role of quality in design (e.g. environmentally friendly homes) while building stronger social communities. I am extremely proud of our MNASQ members who quickly filled both November dates to participate on indoor and outdoor new home construction projects. We also had a few members who could not physically participate, and chose instead to contribute via charitable donation towards community playground equipment. Habitat for Humanity was so pleased by the quality of our work and contributions that they asked us to sponsor a Saturday in December. Our members have asked the Section leaders to also consider sponsoring a community service project this spring.
Sponsoring community service projects is just one tactic the MNASQ section is using to define and promote quality as "Total Customer Experience" (TCE). Total Customer Experience is defined as the overall customer impression based on perceptions and experiences of a company's products, services, people, partners and solutions at every touchpoint. Regardless of whether one subscribes to the notion that the U.S. is shifting from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, fewer people involved in continuous improvement today align themselves with traditional 'Quality'. Hence, one explanation of the decline in ASQ membership since its peak in the late 1980's (Total Quality movement). Today's continuous improvement practitioners are organized around such labels and efforts as process improvement, operational excellence, customer satisfaction, patient safety, etc. Early adoption of quality principles in manufacturing made intuitive sense - it is much easier to view work as a process in the manufacturing environment where supplier-customer interactions are obvious, requirements are generally known, defects are understood, and data are frequent and numerous. Contrast the manufacturing environment to the transactional world where process thinking is not intuitive, the customer is not always identified, the "product" may not be well understood, defects may not be defined, and data are not systematically collected.
Following the "Diffusion of Innovation" model, (Everett Rogers, 1962), service and transactional quality may be regarded as laggards in the quality improvement journey yet hold great potential to delivering significant gains in performance excellence and business success.
In today's difficult economy with increasingly global competition and sophisticated customers, excellent product quality is a given. Dr. Joseph Juran defined quality along three key attributes: free from defects, features, and reliability. Following that definition, competitive advantage today is achieved through superior, consistent, reliable product and service performance that delivers unmatched Total Customer Experience... every transaction, every touchpoint, every time.
To help activate the adoption of quality in transactional processes it helps to visualize the cross-functional nature of most business processes. Whereas most functions are defined as silos, most processes are cross-functional. Keys to transactional process improvement are recognize where the internal supplier-customer hand-offs occur and fully understand the internal customer requirements. A critical role of Quality in transactional processes is to manage the organizational white spaces within each cross-functional process. Many organizations today are applying lean tools and concepts to help them drive speed and improve efficiency through the elimination of waste and non value-added activity.
Dr. Deming is quoted to having said, "Change is not necessary. Survival is optional". Lean, Six Sigma, PDCA, CAPA, etc. are all valuable methods of problem solving and continuous improvement to help assure competitiveness of the enterprise. But I define Quality much broader than continuous improvement alone.
Quality is the intentional alignment of mission, vision, values, leadership, planning, customer focus, work systems, workforce and continual improvement for
organizational success. I prescribe to the "hamburger" model of the Baldrige Criteria where continuous improvement is just one crucial ingredient to performance excellence of the organization.
Quality is achieved by flawless execution at the speed of the customer. So how do we measure flawless execution? The Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) metric and a measure of customer satisfaction (or even better - customer loyalty) are two key indicators.
Traditional measures of COPQ track the measures that are relatively easy
to observe, such as waste, scrap, rework, inspection costs, disposal
costs, warranty and complaints costs, etc. Though these measures are
relatively easy to obtain (i.e. "Visible" costs), more often the greater opportunity for operational excellence
and customer experience is in the "hidden costs" of excess
inventory, numerous engineering change orders, lost sales, costs to expedite shipments, limited product
availability caused by the lack of speed, flow and synchronization of
one's key value streams, etc.
As quality costs are reduced, profits are increased. As value streams are optimized to increase velocity and flow, customer satisfaction is increased due to improved "product" quality and availability.
So, back to Paul Borawski's question of how can the quality professional accelerate the adoption of quality... Quality must be defined much more broadly than product or service quality. Competitive advantage today is achieved by a relentless focus on delivering Total Customer Experience including exceptional product/service/transactional quality, consistently good customer service, a warm, inviting customer experience, a commitment to environmental stewardship and social responsibility. Politics aside, I like Chick-fil-A and Caribou Coffee as two role model organizations in this regard.
Sponsoring community service projects is just one tactic the MNASQ section is using to define and promote quality as "Total Customer Experience" (TCE). Total Customer Experience is defined as the overall customer impression based on perceptions and experiences of a company's products, services, people, partners and solutions at every touchpoint. Regardless of whether one subscribes to the notion that the U.S. is shifting from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, fewer people involved in continuous improvement today align themselves with traditional 'Quality'. Hence, one explanation of the decline in ASQ membership since its peak in the late 1980's (Total Quality movement). Today's continuous improvement practitioners are organized around such labels and efforts as process improvement, operational excellence, customer satisfaction, patient safety, etc. Early adoption of quality principles in manufacturing made intuitive sense - it is much easier to view work as a process in the manufacturing environment where supplier-customer interactions are obvious, requirements are generally known, defects are understood, and data are frequent and numerous. Contrast the manufacturing environment to the transactional world where process thinking is not intuitive, the customer is not always identified, the "product" may not be well understood, defects may not be defined, and data are not systematically collected.
Following the "Diffusion of Innovation" model, (Everett Rogers, 1962), service and transactional quality may be regarded as laggards in the quality improvement journey yet hold great potential to delivering significant gains in performance excellence and business success. In today's difficult economy with increasingly global competition and sophisticated customers, excellent product quality is a given. Dr. Joseph Juran defined quality along three key attributes: free from defects, features, and reliability. Following that definition, competitive advantage today is achieved through superior, consistent, reliable product and service performance that delivers unmatched Total Customer Experience... every transaction, every touchpoint, every time.
To help activate the adoption of quality in transactional processes it helps to visualize the cross-functional nature of most business processes. Whereas most functions are defined as silos, most processes are cross-functional. Keys to transactional process improvement are recognize where the internal supplier-customer hand-offs occur and fully understand the internal customer requirements. A critical role of Quality in transactional processes is to manage the organizational white spaces within each cross-functional process. Many organizations today are applying lean tools and concepts to help them drive speed and improve efficiency through the elimination of waste and non value-added activity.Dr. Deming is quoted to having said, "Change is not necessary. Survival is optional". Lean, Six Sigma, PDCA, CAPA, etc. are all valuable methods of problem solving and continuous improvement to help assure competitiveness of the enterprise. But I define Quality much broader than continuous improvement alone.
Quality is the intentional alignment of mission, vision, values, leadership, planning, customer focus, work systems, workforce and continual improvement for
organizational success. I prescribe to the "hamburger" model of the Baldrige Criteria where continuous improvement is just one crucial ingredient to performance excellence of the organization.Quality is achieved by flawless execution at the speed of the customer. So how do we measure flawless execution? The Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) metric and a measure of customer satisfaction (or even better - customer loyalty) are two key indicators.
![]() |
| COPQ Iceberg illustration from Free-Six-Sigma.com |
![]() |
| Illustration from SixSigmaTraining.org |
So, back to Paul Borawski's question of how can the quality professional accelerate the adoption of quality... Quality must be defined much more broadly than product or service quality. Competitive advantage today is achieved by a relentless focus on delivering Total Customer Experience including exceptional product/service/transactional quality, consistently good customer service, a warm, inviting customer experience, a commitment to environmental stewardship and social responsibility. Politics aside, I like Chick-fil-A and Caribou Coffee as two role model organizations in this regard.
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Increasing the Value of Quality
During my 31 years in Quality engineering and management I have come to understand, appreciate, advocate and promote the greater role of the quality professional in organizations large and small. Though the average person on the street still thinks of quality as QC and inspection activities (aka "little q"), the demand for "Big Q" strategic, enterprise-wide quality has never been stronger, nor the urgency and importance greater. Today's continuing difficult global economic condition is causing uncertainty in the marketplace. Just this evening the CBS television news documentary 60 Minutes asked the question, "Are we headed for a recession or economic recovery?" Many businesses are scaling back their growth plans and even shrinking their work force in order to limit their exposure and reduce their risk in these uncertain times; they are exhibiting a bunker mentality, hoarding their cash instead of investing in capital expansion, commercializing new products and hiring new talent.
Every year since 1999, The Conference Board has asked hundreds of CEOs from the world’s leading organizations to identify their most critical challenges. The top five challenges from the 2012 CEO Challenge are Innovation, Human Capital, Global Political/Economic Risk, Government Regulation, and Global Expansion.
ASQ has conducted six Future of Quality Studies – in 1996, 1999, 2002, 2005, 2008 and 2011. The studies comprise three major components.
The similarities and overlap between these two studies validate the alignment and importance of Quality's increasing role to deliver organizational performance excellence and business results. I believe the Baldrige Criteria serves as an excellent framework to position Quality responsibilities throughout any organization. The Baldrige Criteria categories address leadership, strategic planning, customer focus, workforce engagement, operations management, continuous improvement and business results. 21st Century Quality goes beyond traditional product and service quality. It is about total customer experience: quality as defined by the customer in every transaction, every encounter - and everything in between. 21st Century Quality starts and ends with the customer. Quality has the opportunity - the obligation - to advocate for the customer (internal and external) throughout the Value Stream. Validating the voice of customer (VOC) to assure differentiating performance and competitive advantage is a key opportunity for the Quality improvement professional. The savvy Quality professional also understands the weakness in VOC methods to gather unarticulated customer desires, and is able to experiment with and facilitate new ideation methods.
Continuous improvement of the voice of process (VOP) is the traditional role of Quality, associated with assuring product and service quality. However, simply meeting specifications (requirements) is no longer good enough. Meeting requirements reinforces a goal post mentality where everything in-spec is equally good. Customers and patients today are more discerning; competition and regulations are becoming more numerous, and the pace of change is accelerating. Today's Quality professional recognizes the value of a quality-by-design, "Run to Target" mindset and is able to convey the merits of sustainability and statistical thinking to help organizations achieve operational excellence. Operational Excellence delivers cost-effective solutions through capable and stable, yet responsive and agile work systems and processes. Today's Quality professional is able to teach, coach and manage an effective Quality Management System to assure regulatory and industry compliance and business continuity. Today's Quality professional is also able to recommend, coach and lead the most appropriate continuous improvement methodology given the organization's culture and needs. Lean, Six Sigma and Quality together support an overall business performance improvement strategy comprised of problem solving and continuous improvement. Lean philosophy abhors waste. Lean is a continuous improvement methodology that seeks to reduce cycle time and increase flow (i.e. speed) to consistently deliver quality product/service on time at the right quantity and value. Six Sigma is a project-by-project problem solving methodology that seeks to reduce defects for reduced variability and cost, and improved customer satisfaction. Quality processes exhibit predictable aim with minimal variation. Consistent quality and flow cannot be achieved without stable, capable processes; however, entropy is constantly at work. "Entropy acts on every process, causing it to move toward deterioration and decay, wear and tear, breakdowns and failures", says Dr. Don Wheeler. Holding the gains and demonstrating a personal commitment to continual improvement is everyone's job. Successful business performance improvement requires the participation of employees at all levels of the organization. Implementing continuous improvement where everyone is involved greatly enhances employee engagement, resulting in increased customer satisfaction and loyalty. Quality's role as change agent and catalyst for change is a critical, growing responsibility in today's fast paced global economy.
The experienced Quality professional, skilled in strategic planning and change management, is also able consult and facilitate in strategy development, deployment and execution. Hoshin kanri/ business process execution methods are a new frontier for today's Quality professional seeking to make an impact at the C-Suite for enterprise improvement.
I believe the strategic, customer-focused Quality function is uniquely qualified to help businesses mired in indecision and paralyzed by fear to achieve sustainable, quality growth. As Quality professionals we should seek every opportunity to teach, coach and consult to enlighten others that delivering total customer experience requires everyone's participation, resulting in increased customer satisfaction, brand loyalty, confidence and growth.
Every year since 1999, The Conference Board has asked hundreds of CEOs from the world’s leading organizations to identify their most critical challenges. The top five challenges from the 2012 CEO Challenge are Innovation, Human Capital, Global Political/Economic Risk, Government Regulation, and Global Expansion.
ASQ has conducted six Future of Quality Studies – in 1996, 1999, 2002, 2005, 2008 and 2011. The studies comprise three major components.
- Identify the key forces that are most likely to shape the future of quality.
- Develop alternative scenarios describing how these forces might unfold.
- Determine implications for organizations, the quality field, and for quality professionals.
The similarities and overlap between these two studies validate the alignment and importance of Quality's increasing role to deliver organizational performance excellence and business results. I believe the Baldrige Criteria serves as an excellent framework to position Quality responsibilities throughout any organization. The Baldrige Criteria categories address leadership, strategic planning, customer focus, workforce engagement, operations management, continuous improvement and business results. 21st Century Quality goes beyond traditional product and service quality. It is about total customer experience: quality as defined by the customer in every transaction, every encounter - and everything in between. 21st Century Quality starts and ends with the customer. Quality has the opportunity - the obligation - to advocate for the customer (internal and external) throughout the Value Stream. Validating the voice of customer (VOC) to assure differentiating performance and competitive advantage is a key opportunity for the Quality improvement professional. The savvy Quality professional also understands the weakness in VOC methods to gather unarticulated customer desires, and is able to experiment with and facilitate new ideation methods.
Continuous improvement of the voice of process (VOP) is the traditional role of Quality, associated with assuring product and service quality. However, simply meeting specifications (requirements) is no longer good enough. Meeting requirements reinforces a goal post mentality where everything in-spec is equally good. Customers and patients today are more discerning; competition and regulations are becoming more numerous, and the pace of change is accelerating. Today's Quality professional recognizes the value of a quality-by-design, "Run to Target" mindset and is able to convey the merits of sustainability and statistical thinking to help organizations achieve operational excellence. Operational Excellence delivers cost-effective solutions through capable and stable, yet responsive and agile work systems and processes. Today's Quality professional is able to teach, coach and manage an effective Quality Management System to assure regulatory and industry compliance and business continuity. Today's Quality professional is also able to recommend, coach and lead the most appropriate continuous improvement methodology given the organization's culture and needs. Lean, Six Sigma and Quality together support an overall business performance improvement strategy comprised of problem solving and continuous improvement. Lean philosophy abhors waste. Lean is a continuous improvement methodology that seeks to reduce cycle time and increase flow (i.e. speed) to consistently deliver quality product/service on time at the right quantity and value. Six Sigma is a project-by-project problem solving methodology that seeks to reduce defects for reduced variability and cost, and improved customer satisfaction. Quality processes exhibit predictable aim with minimal variation. Consistent quality and flow cannot be achieved without stable, capable processes; however, entropy is constantly at work. "Entropy acts on every process, causing it to move toward deterioration and decay, wear and tear, breakdowns and failures", says Dr. Don Wheeler. Holding the gains and demonstrating a personal commitment to continual improvement is everyone's job. Successful business performance improvement requires the participation of employees at all levels of the organization. Implementing continuous improvement where everyone is involved greatly enhances employee engagement, resulting in increased customer satisfaction and loyalty. Quality's role as change agent and catalyst for change is a critical, growing responsibility in today's fast paced global economy.
The experienced Quality professional, skilled in strategic planning and change management, is also able consult and facilitate in strategy development, deployment and execution. Hoshin kanri/ business process execution methods are a new frontier for today's Quality professional seeking to make an impact at the C-Suite for enterprise improvement.
I believe the strategic, customer-focused Quality function is uniquely qualified to help businesses mired in indecision and paralyzed by fear to achieve sustainable, quality growth. As Quality professionals we should seek every opportunity to teach, coach and consult to enlighten others that delivering total customer experience requires everyone's participation, resulting in increased customer satisfaction, brand loyalty, confidence and growth.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Speed is Life
In this highly competitive global economy I believe that "speed is life". ASQ CEO Paul Borawski asks for some of the ways the practice of quality is changing to meet the needs of faster, faster, faster.
Now, certainly there are many, many instances in business as in life when, not executed flawlessly, speed can kill. In fact, there are numerous examples when tampering and knee-jerk reactions have resulted in undesired results. While "first to market" offers a distinct competitive advantage when done right, speed at all costs is not a successful long-term strategy. "Quality" processes must be designed to support agile business needs. The key is to focus on velocity, not speed alone. Velocity is speed with purpose, with aim, at the speed of the customer.
Velocity requires a thorough understanding of one's value proposition, and the elimination of non-value added activities and other forms of muda (waste) in your key value streams. Waste is in the way of your business success. Operational excellence is delivered through understanding and translating the voice of customer into high quality, reliable products and services, the elimination of waste, and standardization of the best known way as foundations for continual improvement. Organizations must adopt a learning culture where every employee is encouraged, recognized and rewarded for sharing their best practices and key success factors. Helping deploy a knowledge management system that supports the shift from "learn to know" to one of "learn to do" is another area where the Quality function can help drive business velocity. Additionally, Quality can play an important role in helping to identify the hand-offs, document internal customer requirements, and manage the organizational white spaces in inter-departmental processes (value streams).
Last month I spoke to the role of trust in driving speed, employee empowerment and culture change. Trust and mutual respect are critical to fostering a safe environment that promotes healthy crucial conversations, welcomes experimentation and values continual learning. In business you get what is measured; measurements drive behavior. Leaders must create experiences and model behaviors to foster beliefs that will drive the actions necessary to achieve desired results. (Connors: Journey to the Emerald City). Here, Quality can assist management to adopt a responsive Lean Management System that transforms strategy into success.
Speed is Life, but speed can kill if not skillfully and flawlessly executed. Quality can be the agent of change in this cultural transformation.
Now, certainly there are many, many instances in business as in life when, not executed flawlessly, speed can kill. In fact, there are numerous examples when tampering and knee-jerk reactions have resulted in undesired results. While "first to market" offers a distinct competitive advantage when done right, speed at all costs is not a successful long-term strategy. "Quality" processes must be designed to support agile business needs. The key is to focus on velocity, not speed alone. Velocity is speed with purpose, with aim, at the speed of the customer.
Velocity requires a thorough understanding of one's value proposition, and the elimination of non-value added activities and other forms of muda (waste) in your key value streams. Waste is in the way of your business success. Operational excellence is delivered through understanding and translating the voice of customer into high quality, reliable products and services, the elimination of waste, and standardization of the best known way as foundations for continual improvement. Organizations must adopt a learning culture where every employee is encouraged, recognized and rewarded for sharing their best practices and key success factors. Helping deploy a knowledge management system that supports the shift from "learn to know" to one of "learn to do" is another area where the Quality function can help drive business velocity. Additionally, Quality can play an important role in helping to identify the hand-offs, document internal customer requirements, and manage the organizational white spaces in inter-departmental processes (value streams).
Last month I spoke to the role of trust in driving speed, employee empowerment and culture change. Trust and mutual respect are critical to fostering a safe environment that promotes healthy crucial conversations, welcomes experimentation and values continual learning. In business you get what is measured; measurements drive behavior. Leaders must create experiences and model behaviors to foster beliefs that will drive the actions necessary to achieve desired results. (Connors: Journey to the Emerald City). Here, Quality can assist management to adopt a responsive Lean Management System that transforms strategy into success.
Speed is Life, but speed can kill if not skillfully and flawlessly executed. Quality can be the agent of change in this cultural transformation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



